I think it was kind of pointless
for the couple to take this argument to court; however, the judge should have
at least listened to what the couple had to say since they did take it to
court. I get that the company did not want to shoot the video because of their
religious beliefs, but companies are not allowed to refuse service to a certain
race or person because of their skin color; that is discrimination and that is
prohibited by the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964. This company was refusing
service based off of their genders and who they were marrying, that is
discrimination because you are categorizing a person based off of who they are.
Same-sex relationships have been
around for a long time and same-sex marriage is now becoming a thing and it
will probably get a lot more common so even if you do not agree with it, some
people are just going to have to get used to it. I think the company should
have shot the video even though they did not agree with the marriage. They are
humans just like the rest of us and should be treated just like anyone else. The
company was still going to get the same amount of money and instead of taking
the video, they refused to and got terrible publicity.